Prototype the Forgejo review presentation and feedback lifecycle #39

Open
opened 2026-07-14 22:37:40 -04:00 by caleb-brown · 0 comments
Owner

Parent

#29 — Temper v1 Greenfield Product and Architecture

Question

What concrete Forgejo-native experience should present processing status, one managed review report, inline findings, reviewed revision and coverage, manual controls, partial and failed reviews, no-findings language, reruns, superseded results, deleted remote effects, and finding reconciliation without duplicate or stale feedback?

Blocked by

  • #30 — Define Temper's developer-facing review contract
  • #33 — Research the supported Forgejo capability and version envelope
  • #35 — Define revision, trigger, deduplication, retry, and stale-run semantics
## Parent [#29 — Temper v1 Greenfield Product and Architecture](https://git.caleb-brown.dev/caleb-brown/temper/issues/29) ## Question What concrete Forgejo-native experience should present processing status, one managed review report, inline findings, reviewed revision and coverage, manual controls, partial and failed reviews, no-findings language, reruns, superseded results, deleted remote effects, and finding reconciliation without duplicate or stale feedback? ## Blocked by - [#30](https://git.caleb-brown.dev/caleb-brown/temper/issues/30) — Define Temper's developer-facing review contract - [#33](https://git.caleb-brown.dev/caleb-brown/temper/issues/33) — Research the supported Forgejo capability and version envelope - [#35](https://git.caleb-brown.dev/caleb-brown/temper/issues/35) — Define revision, trigger, deduplication, retry, and stale-run semantics
Sign in to join this conversation.
No description provided.