Prototype Temper Operator workflows and information architecture #40

Open
opened 2026-07-14 22:37:41 -04:00 by caleb-brown · 0 comments
Owner

Parent

#29 — Temper v1 Greenfield Product and Architecture

Question

What end-to-end Temper Operator experience should cover initial readiness, provider setup, Forgejo connections, repository onboarding, Review Policies and Reviewer Profiles, Review Run diagnosis, broken-state recovery, operator accounts, retention, upgrades, and system health, and which information architecture makes the next corrective action obvious?

Blocked by

  • #32 — Define the supported production deployment envelope
  • #37 — Define Review Policy and Reviewer Profile semantics
  • #38 — Define repository onboarding and connection lifecycle
  • #39 — Prototype the Forgejo review presentation and feedback lifecycle
## Parent [#29 — Temper v1 Greenfield Product and Architecture](https://git.caleb-brown.dev/caleb-brown/temper/issues/29) ## Question What end-to-end Temper Operator experience should cover initial readiness, provider setup, Forgejo connections, repository onboarding, Review Policies and Reviewer Profiles, Review Run diagnosis, broken-state recovery, operator accounts, retention, upgrades, and system health, and which information architecture makes the next corrective action obvious? ## Blocked by - [#32](https://git.caleb-brown.dev/caleb-brown/temper/issues/32) — Define the supported production deployment envelope - [#37](https://git.caleb-brown.dev/caleb-brown/temper/issues/37) — Define Review Policy and Reviewer Profile semantics - [#38](https://git.caleb-brown.dev/caleb-brown/temper/issues/38) — Define repository onboarding and connection lifecycle - [#39](https://git.caleb-brown.dev/caleb-brown/temper/issues/39) — Prototype the Forgejo review presentation and feedback lifecycle
Sign in to join this conversation.
No description provided.