Specify v1 acceptance scenarios and implementation slices #44

Open
opened 2026-07-14 22:37:44 -04:00 by caleb-brown · 0 comments
Owner

Parent

#29 — Temper v1 Greenfield Product and Architecture

Question

Which end-to-end acceptance scenarios, contract fixtures, failure-injection cases, security checks, load targets, migration and upgrade checks, and tracer-bullet implementation slices should govern the greenfield build, and in what dependency order should they be delivered?

Blocked by

  • #34 — Define review-quality and safety acceptance criteria
  • #39 — Prototype the Forgejo review presentation and feedback lifecycle
  • #40 — Prototype Temper Operator workflows and information architecture
  • #43 — Choose the application architecture and technology stack
## Parent [#29 — Temper v1 Greenfield Product and Architecture](https://git.caleb-brown.dev/caleb-brown/temper/issues/29) ## Question Which end-to-end acceptance scenarios, contract fixtures, failure-injection cases, security checks, load targets, migration and upgrade checks, and tracer-bullet implementation slices should govern the greenfield build, and in what dependency order should they be delivered? ## Blocked by - [#34](https://git.caleb-brown.dev/caleb-brown/temper/issues/34) — Define review-quality and safety acceptance criteria - [#39](https://git.caleb-brown.dev/caleb-brown/temper/issues/39) — Prototype the Forgejo review presentation and feedback lifecycle - [#40](https://git.caleb-brown.dev/caleb-brown/temper/issues/40) — Prototype Temper Operator workflows and information architecture - [#43](https://git.caleb-brown.dev/caleb-brown/temper/issues/43) — Choose the application architecture and technology stack
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Reference
caleb-brown/temper#44
No description provided.